LoRa Based Real-Time Landslide Monitoring System (Logbook)

For the seventh week, presentation on proposed project are made. During the proposal defense presentation, valuable suggestions were provided to enhance my work. One of the suggestions I received was to conduct research on the specific data requirements of geologists for a landslide monitoring system. This recommendation aims to deepen my understanding of the information and parameters that geologists rely on when monitoring landslides. By acquiring this knowledge, I can tailor my project to effectively meet their needs and ensure its relevance in the field. In addition, the assessors highlighted the importance of minimizing project development costs. This suggestion encourages me to explore cost-effective approaches and strategies without compromising the quality and functionality of the system. By seeking efficient alternatives and optimizing resource allocation, I can ensure that the project remains within budgetary constraints while delivering the desired outcomes.

In the sixth week, I have prepared the slides for the presentation of my FYP 1 proposal. The slides encompass various aspects of the project, including the Introduction, Literature Review, and Methodology. In the Introduction section, I have emphasized key elements such as the project's background, problem statement, project objectives, and scope & limitations. These aspects serve to provide a comprehensive understanding of the project's context. For the Literature Review, I have mentioned and summarized all the relevant papers that have been reviewed. This section aims to showcase the existing research and its relevance to my project.                However, the most crucial part of the proposal presentation lies in the Methodology section. Here, I have elucidated how the project functions, the techniques employed, improvements made compared to previous versions, the hardware and software employed, the Gantt chart outlining the pro...

During the fifth week, I had a productive discussion with my supervisor to gain clarity on the desired functioning of the system. We explored various aspects, including the specific functionalities, features, and interactions that the system should exhibit. Furthermore, we discussed the hardware and software components that will be utilized to bring the system to life. Following our discussion, I began working on creating a block diagram and flow chart to visually represent the structure and flow of the system. These diagrams serve as invaluable tools to comprehend the system's architecture and the interconnections between its various components. Once I completed the initial versions of the block diagram and flow chart, I submitted them to Dr. Aizat, my project supervisor, for review. Upon reviewing the diagrams, Dr. Aizat provided valuable feedback and identified a few errors that needed to be rectified. I carefully analyzed his suggestions and promptly made the necessary revision...

In the fourth week of my FYP journey, I devoted my time to conducting an in-depth review of eight relevant research papers. This comprehensive review process aimed to gain a deeper understanding of how various projects approached similar objectives to the one I am undertaking. As I delved into each paper, I discovered that different projects employed a diverse range of sensors and techniques to address their specific needs. These included MEMS accelerometers, tilt sensors, rain detectors, and more. Examining the methodologies and outcomes of these studies provided me with invaluable insights into the effectiveness and suitability of different sensor options. The thoroughness of the review process allowed me to make informed decisions regarding the selection of sensors and techniques for my own project. By carefully considering the specific requirements and objectives, I was able to identify the most suitable sensor types and techniques to be implemented in my upcoming project. This car...